Joomla TemplatesBest Web HostingBest Joomla Hosting
Given a Choice, Which Would You Prefer, Organic Or Conventional Foodstuff?
Written by Connor Sullivan   
Monday, 14 December 2009 09:50
The catchword 'environment' has often been meant to refer to our surroundings. The eternal multi-fold objective is to maintain it through defense and shielding. But it appears that in one vital area there is less stress granted and this concerns our food from the soil. It will perhaps take a geotechnical consultant to examine a certain area's soil conditions to determine how much of it is contaminated by chemicals --- and it would be an easy chore for these geotechnical consultants but it is for us to choose whether we grow food in them. This Swedish experiment hopes to persuade us to do so.
by ConnorSullivan


The catchword 'environment' has always been meant to be our setting. The eternal Multi-faceted objective is to maintain it through defense and safeguards. But it seems that in one crucial area there is reduced emphasis granted and this concerns our foodstuff from the earth. It will perhaps take a geotechnical consultant to analyze a particular area's topsoil conditions to determine how much of it is affected by chemicals --- and it will be an easy chore for these geotechnical consultants but it is for us to choose if we cultivate food in them. This Swedish experiment desires to convince us to do so.

The project

Essentially the experiment intended to know the variation in product quality between those grain and vegetables grown through organic farming and ordinary -read chemical fertilizer--- agriculture production. The experiment began in 1958 and ended in 1990, 32 years of growing crops in all seasons to equalize the contrast. Grown during the experiment hav been summer wheat, beets, clover/grass mix and potatoes, fertilized in eight applications, rotated every four years with no replication. In other words one crop was grown each year with a distinctive fertilizer treatment so that all four crops were fertilized at least once by a different kind of fertilizer over a four-year cycle.

The results

The experiment's results showed grain and vegetables grown in organic farming have higher protein quality although less volumes, more starch and greater capability to endure extended storage time and undergo situations of stress. More specifically, the wheat and potatoes farmed organically have lower crude protein and free amino acids content but better in the quality of its pure protein and essential amino acids. Moreover, the capacity to resist decomposition in storage was higher in organically-farmed potatoes. There is also a significant increase in soil fecundity in the organic fields (65% compared to 50%) than in the conventional, as well as substantial variation in resistance to pest influx, in favor of the organic produce.

Its meaning

Though there is no direct inference stated as to the produce's influence on humans, it is quite clear from any view that those grains and vegetables farmed in organically fertilized soil will be of greater advantage to humans eating them than those grown in chemical-fertilizer fields. Higher starch content may translate to better consumption approval level, while those with more essential amino acids may engender better nourishment. The variations may be small at first glance, but if this is multiplied and viewed in extended term the variation will be substantial indeed.

Likewise, the improvement in soil richness, resistance to infestation, and longer storage time will likewise translate to greater food production and keeping, again benefitting humans.

Conclusion

There had been and remain to have so much made to preserveconserve the environment in many facets, kinds and methods. Yet it seems that little has been done or is being done to preserve the physical body via the food eaten. Although it is correct that more food production is being demanded by a fast-growing world population, and chemical fertilizer appears to be the most rapid method of increasing agricultural produce, it must not be forgotten that we can also poison our health by the food we ingest. Or maybe it now depends on us each not to?

About the Author: